The Insufficient Radicality of Marburg Neo-Kantian Philosophical Contributions in Rescuing Metaphysics from Crisis

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Mohammda Raayat Jahromi 1
Hassan Behzad Gendeschmin 2
Mohammad Hassan Heidari 2
Ahmad Rajabi 3
1 Department of Philosophy, Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin, Iran
2 Department of Philosophy, Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University of Qazwin, Iran
3 Department of Philosophy, Humanities, University of Tehran. Iran
Abstract


In the second half of the nineteenth century, with the emergence of major crises in multiple dimensions of metaphysics, one of the major efforts to deliverance metaphysics from the crisis was the contributions of the Marburg philosophical school, which made methodological efforts from 1870 until the First World War. In this article, after an impartial description of these activities, we will see that from a phenomenological standpoint, their contributions were not as radical, for two reasons: thematic and methodological. According to Husserl, such this deliverance lies not in its salvation as Epistemology or the logic of sciences, but in the salvation of the Subject through the understanding and configuration of the three crises of philosophy, science, and the crisis of European man [thematic criticism]. In terms of methodology, the transcendental method of the Marburgians is not progressive like phenomenology, but rather regressive.

Keywords

  1. Reference
    - Aristotle (2021). Metaphysics. Trans. Sharafoddin Khorasani. Tehran, Hikmet Press (Persian).
    - Cohen, Hermann (1883). Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte, Berlin: Dümmler. Partially translated as The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History by D. Hyder and L. Patton, in NKR
    - Falkenburg, Brigitte (2020). On Method: The fact of science and the distinction between Natural science and Humanities (in Kant yearbook: Kant and Neo-Kantianism, edited by Dietmar H. Heidemann. University of Luxembourg.
    - Friedman, Michael (2000). A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and Heidegger. By Carus Publishing Company.
    - Heis, Jeremy (Summer 2018 Edition). "Neo-Kantianism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
    - Husserl, E. (2010). Philosophy as strong science. Trans. Moslem Agaii. Tehran, Nashre Markaz [Persian]
    - Husserl, E (2020). Cartesian Meditation. Trans. Abdolkarim Rashidian. Tehran, Ney Press [Persian]
    - Kant (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (M. Weigelt, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
    - Kant. (1987). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Trans. Golamali Haddad Adel. Tehran. Markaze- Nashre- Daneshgahi, [Persian].
    - Kinzel, Katherina (2021). Historical thought in German neo-Kantianism, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29:4, 579-589.
    - Lanier, Anderson R. (2004). Neo-Kantianism and the roots of Anti-Psychologism, British Journal for the History of Philosophy.
    - Luft, Sebastian (2018). Kant, Neo-Kantianism, and Phenomenology. Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications.
    - Matherne, Samantha (2015). In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, edited by J Tyler Friedman, Sebastian Luft, Marburg Neo-Kantianism as philosophy of culture. Published by De Gruyter
    - Patton, Lydia (2004). Hermann Cohen’s History and Philosophy of Science. A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Ph.D.
    - Piche, Claude (2000). Heidegger and the Neo-Kantian Reading of Kant. In Heidegger, German Idealism and Neo-Kantianism. Edited by Tom Rockmore, Humanity Books, an imprint of Prometheus Books.
    - Willy, Thomas E (1978). Back To Kant: The revival of Kantianism in German social and Historical Thought, 1860-1914. Wayne State University Press.