The concepts of logica docens and logica utens and the discussion of the distinction between them became popular among logicians since the Middle Ages. Of course, this duality was not considered for a long time after the Middle Ages until Peirce, an American logician and pragmatist philosopher, reintroduced it into logical discussions. Peirce himself used these concepts to express his views on the nature of logic. Today, other logicians such as Priest have used this duality to express and explain various logical issues. In discussions such as examining criticisms of logic, teaching logic, the issue of adopting a logic, logical pluralism, and the possibility of reforming and revising logic, etc. Using this duality can lead to a better confrontation with problems and, therefore, help explain problems better and find solutions to them.
Carroll, L. (1895, April). What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Mind, 4(14), 278-280.
Cohnitz, D., & Nicolai, C. (2021). How to adopt a logic. Dialectica, 75(4), 1-31.
Dinani., G. E. (2000). The Adventure of Philosophical Thought in Muslim World. (2 ed., Vol. 1). tarh_e_no. [Persian]
Fisher, J. (2007). On the Philosophy of Logic. Cengage Learning,.
Geach, P. T. (1979). On Teaching Logic. Philosophy, 54, pp 5-17. doi:10.1017/S0031819100024840
Lu-Adler, H. (2018). The Nature and Place of Logic: A History of controversies. Oxford University Press.
Padro, R. (2015). What the Tortoise Said to Kripke: the Adoption Problem and the. CUNY Academic Works.
Peirce, C. S. (1994). Peirce: Collected Papers - PAST MASTERS Introduction. (J. Deely, Ed.)
Priest, G. (2014). Revising logic. In P. Rush (Ed.), The metaphysics of logic (pp. 211-223). Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. v. (1954). Carnap and logical truth. Synthese, 12(4), 350-374.
Wolenski, J. (2016, December). Logic in the Light of Cognitive Science. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric, 48(1), 87-101. doi:10.1515/slgr-2016-0057
Yousofsani, S. M. (2004). Definition and Goal of Logic from Muslim Logicians’ View point. Philosophy of Religion Research(3), 111-124.[Persian]
Kahneman D (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Link]
Lu-Adler H (2018). The nature and place of logic: A history of controversies. In: Kant and the science of logic: A historical and philosophical reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 31-68. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190907136.003.0003]
Padro R (2015). What the tortoise said to Kripke: The Adoption Problem and the epistemology of logic [dissertation]. New York: CUNY Academic Works. [Link]
Peirce CS (1994). The collected papers-past masters introduction. Deely J, editor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Link]
Priest G (2014). Revising logic. In: The metaphysics of logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 211-223. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139626279.016]
Nabati,F. (2025). The Importance of Paying Attention to the Logica Docens/Logica Utens Duality. Philosophical Thought, 5(2), 141-154. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.2.141
MLA
Nabati,F. . "The Importance of Paying Attention to the Logica Docens/Logica Utens Duality", Philosophical Thought, 5, 2, 2025, 141-154. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.2.141
HARVARD
Nabati F. (2025). 'The Importance of Paying Attention to the Logica Docens/Logica Utens Duality', Philosophical Thought, 5(2), pp. 141-154. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.2.141
CHICAGO
F. Nabati, "The Importance of Paying Attention to the Logica Docens/Logica Utens Duality," Philosophical Thought, 5 2 (2025): 141-154, doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.2.141
VANCOUVER
Nabati F. The Importance of Paying Attention to the Logica Docens/Logica Utens Duality. Philosophical Thought, 2025; 5(2): 141-154. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.2.141